<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fox Business News Foozles Again: How A New Video Strategy Could Salvage Their Online Reputation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davisfreeberg.com/2007/11/29/fox-business-news-foozles-again-how-a-new-video-strategy-could-salvage-their-online-reputation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davisfreeberg.com/2007/11/29/fox-business-news-foozles-again-how-a-new-video-strategy-could-salvage-their-online-reputation/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 00:12:30 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Davis</title>
		<link>http://davisfreeberg.com/2007/11/29/fox-business-news-foozles-again-how-a-new-video-strategy-could-salvage-their-online-reputation/comment-page-1/#comment-115861</link>
		<dc:creator>Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 02:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davisfreeberg.com/2007/11/29/fox-business-news-foozles-again-how-a-new-video-strategy-could-salvage-their-online-reputation/#comment-115861</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s funny SJ, the sad part is that you are probably right.  I&#039;m not sure how their picks have done, but earlier this year, I took a look at IBD &quot;corporate news&quot; and found that you would have lost about 50% over one year.

http://davisfreeberg.com/2007/06/15/who-needs-spam-when-you-can-advertise/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s funny SJ, the sad part is that you are probably right.  I&#8217;m not sure how their picks have done, but earlier this year, I took a look at IBD &#8220;corporate news&#8221; and found that you would have lost about 50% over one year.</p>
<p><a href="http://davisfreeberg.com/2007/06/15/who-needs-spam-when-you-can-advertise/" rel="nofollow">http://davisfreeberg.com/2007/06/15/who-needs-spam-when-you-can-advertise/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SJ</title>
		<link>http://davisfreeberg.com/2007/11/29/fox-business-news-foozles-again-how-a-new-video-strategy-could-salvage-their-online-reputation/comment-page-1/#comment-115858</link>
		<dc:creator>SJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 01:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davisfreeberg.com/2007/11/29/fox-business-news-foozles-again-how-a-new-video-strategy-could-salvage-their-online-reputation/#comment-115858</guid>
		<description>One of the top 10 ways to lose money in the stock market in 2008 would be to rely on Fox Business Channel for your market news.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the top 10 ways to lose money in the stock market in 2008 would be to rely on Fox Business Channel for your market news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snarkolepsy</title>
		<link>http://davisfreeberg.com/2007/11/29/fox-business-news-foozles-again-how-a-new-video-strategy-could-salvage-their-online-reputation/comment-page-1/#comment-107056</link>
		<dc:creator>snarkolepsy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 17:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davisfreeberg.com/2007/11/29/fox-business-news-foozles-again-how-a-new-video-strategy-could-salvage-their-online-reputation/#comment-107056</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t watched the Fox business channel - but I assume it is heavily dominated by female anchors. Seems like most of Fox is these days. 

Then watch Red Eye a time or two. Well, try 10 - because its funny. But you will see how completely ditsy the anchors are. It will explain everything.

Fox is geared more for Entertainment Tonight - not business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t watched the Fox business channel &#8211; but I assume it is heavily dominated by female anchors. Seems like most of Fox is these days. </p>
<p>Then watch Red Eye a time or two. Well, try 10 &#8211; because its funny. But you will see how completely ditsy the anchors are. It will explain everything.</p>
<p>Fox is geared more for Entertainment Tonight &#8211; not business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
