Even though I’m an HDTV fanatic, it wasn’t until this past weekend, that I finally made the jump to an HD monitor. While I don’t have HDTV tuners on my Media Center, I do have an HD camcorder and it was important for me to be able to edit my high resolution videos.
After doing a little bit of research, I decided to pick up a SyncMasterTM 226BW from Samsung. Between the new monitor and my ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT video card, the resolution looks absolutely stunning. Even my home movies look fantastic in HDTV. I really couldn’t have been happier with the upgrade.
Unfortunately, Hollywood isn’t quite as thrilled about my new HD Media Dream Machine and they’ve decided to punish me by revoking my Watch Now privileges from Netflix.
I first found out about the problem on New Year’s Eve, when I went to log into my account. When I tried to launch a streaming movie, I was greeted with an error message asking me to “reset” my DRM. Luckily, Netflix’s help page on the topic included a link to a DRM reset utility, but when I went to install the program, I stopped dead in my tracks when I saw this warning.
The minute I saw“this will potentially remove playback licenses from your computer, including those from companies other than Netflix or Microsoft” I knew better than to hit continue. Before nuking my entire digital library, I decided to call Netflix’s technical support, to see if I could get to the bottom of my C00D11B1 error message.
When I called them they confirmed my worst fears. In order to access the Watch Now service, I had to give Microsoft’s DRM sniffing program access to all of the files on my hard drive. If the software found any non-Netflix video files, it would revoke my rights to the content and invalidate the DRM. This means that I would lose all the movies that I’ve purchased from Amazon’s Unbox, just to troubleshoot the issue.
Technically, there is a way to back up the licenses before doing a DRM reset, but it’s a pretty complex process, even by my standards. When I asked Netflix for more details, they referred me to Amazon for assistance.
Perhaps even worse than having to choose between having access to Netflix or giving up my Unbox movies was the realization that my real problems were actually tied to the shiny new monitor that I’ve already grown fond of.
Netflix’s software allows them to look at the video card, cables and the monitor that you are using and when they checked mine out, it was apparently a little too high def to pass their DRM filters.
Because my computer allows me to send an unrestricted HDTV feed to my monitor, Hollywood has decided to revoke my ability to stream 480 resolution video files from Netflix. In order to fix my problem, Netflix recommended that I downgrade to a lower res VGA setup.
As part of their agreement with Hollywood, Netflix uses a program called COPP (Certified Output Protection Protocal). COPP is made by Microsoft and the protocol restricts how you are able to transfer digital files off of your PC. When I ran COPP to identify the error on my machine, it gave me an ominous warning that “the exclusive semaphere is owned by another process.”
My Netflix technician told me that he had never heard of this particular error and thought that it was unique to my setup. When I consulted Microsoft, they suggested that I consult the creator of the program. Since Microsoft wrote the COPP software, I wasn’t sure who to turn to after that.
The irony in all of this, is that the DRM that Hollywood is so much in love with, is really only harming their paying customers. When you do a DRM reset, it’s not your pirated files that get revoked, it’s the ones that you already paid for that are at risk. I’m not allowed to watch low res Netflix files, even though I have the capability to download high def torrents? How does this even make sense? It’s as if the studios want their digital strategies to fail.
While I understand the need for the studios to protect their content, I believe that these measures go too far. It makes little sense to block my ability to copy low res internet movies, when I can always rip the DVD straight from my Netflix discs instead. By blocking access to my Netflix membership, Hollywood is once again punishing their customers by pushing defective DRM.


#1 by anonymo on January 3, 2008 - 3:46 am
This behavior, if repeatable, is quite possibly subject to antitrust actions against MS… “You can play videos from people we’ve made arrangements with, but our competitors we’re deleting”
#2 by Krisjohn on January 3, 2008 - 4:13 am
And this is why I’m not interested in a Blu-ray drive for my PC. This paranoia about having a protected channel all the way from the disc to the picture on the screen is a technical nightmare I’m not interested in fixing. If I could just whack a Blu-ray or HD-DVD (or combo) drive into a PC and know I’d be able to display as high a resolution picture as whatever monitor I chose to connect (up to whatever signal is stored on the disc) I’d already have bought the drive(s) and a *heap* of HD titles.
Knowing instead that playing high def from a “protected” source on a PC is black magic I’ve stayed well clear of it.
#3 by Lachlan Hunt on January 3, 2008 - 5:21 am
In future, I strongly recommend you boycott any download services like Amazon Unbox and Netflix that are crippled with DRM. Personally, I have never, and will never buy any digital content that is crippled with DRM (DVD’s inneffective DRM doesn’t count).
I’m going to stick with BitTorrent, buying DVDs and buying from DRM-free sites (e.g. sanctuaryforall.com) until the MPAA wakes up and stops punishing thier customers.
#4 by Adam Fields on January 3, 2008 - 6:11 am
This is also the problem with having one centralized license that controls everything on your computer. The Netflix licenses should be totally independent from your Amazon licenses.
#5 by AmateurX on January 3, 2008 - 6:16 am
Tell Netflix you don’t want their DRM: http://defectivebydesign.org/blog/1093
They have cut-out miniletters to include in their envelopes! http://www.defectivebydesign.org/sites/nodrm.civicactions.net/files/netflix-business-card_0.pdf
#6 by NMONNET on January 3, 2008 - 7:05 am
This what us free software advocate have been warning you of for 10 years, if not more. That’s “free” as in “freedom”, not “free beer.” Freedom to watch what you’ve bought on your new screen. Yeah, I know, I’m such a dreamer.
#7 by Christopher Palmer on January 3, 2008 - 7:05 am
I have a standard monitor (a 19″ CRT) hooked up to my new Vista computer. Over the holidays, I bought a 32″ LCD TV to hang in the study/computer room as an HDTV/Wii display/DVD display/PS2 display. Since I’d hooked everything else up to it, I also ran an HDMI cable from the second port of the Radeon card to use it as a second monitor. I set it up properly – 720P resolution with digital signal – as a shared desktop (different resolutions of course) and I was able to run Media Center on it to watch DVDs, local video content, and analog resolution video from my older tuner card in the PC.
The only tricky thing I had to do was switch my primary monitor to the LCD TV in order to play most games on the TV, like Half-Life 2.
I was just spelling all of this out because it may be just that I was using it as a dual monitor, but it didn’t affect my Netflix streaming at all. I could just drag my IE window to the LCD display, maximize it, start my streaming movie, and then click fullscreen and I got great picture quality and no DRM warnings. I don’t have any Amazon Unbox content (or any other MS DRM content that I know of), so that may have something to do with it as well.
As a general rule, I hate DRM and will go out of my way to only purchase content that is DRM free. I have no qualms whatsoever about ripping my purchased DVDs to iPod video format instead of buying them again on iTunes and I wouldn’t purchased downloadable content from Amazon that is going to be tied to DRM licenses on my computer. I do, however, kinda like Netflix’s Watch it Now feature. Since it is streamed, I don’t have to worry about being able to watch it next week, or after a system upgrade, or after the service goes away (like Wal-Mart’s service that just went belly-up). I would be upset, as you were, if the ability to watch a streamed movie meant I could no longer watch stuff that I had legitimately purchased.
#8 by Brent on January 3, 2008 - 7:18 am
It’s ridiculous for consumers to have to deal with this type of DRM nonsense. The providers such as Amazon and Netflix see this as a necessary evil.
Hope you get it worked out – be sure and mention this to mike at HackingNetflix as the Netflix folks watch Mikes blog pretty closely. Maybe you can get some help out of Netflix after all.
Brent
#9 by Neal on January 3, 2008 - 7:40 am
Although I don’t think you specified one way or the another, can I assume you are running Vista? The article you linked to about your monitor being the source of the problem was Vista specific, and it also mentioned the staying with XP would be preferable.
For context, I have a Samsung 50″ 720p DLP with a direct PC input, and am running a PC connected to it specifically dedicated to feeding audio/video using iTunes, Miro and Netflix Instant Viewing. I’ve had zero trouble such as you describe, but then, the PC is running XP, NOT Vista.
Sounds like one more vote (as if it were still necessary!) for avoiding Vista.
#10 by Dave Zatz on January 3, 2008 - 7:54 am
Brent, Both Netflix and Amazon use Microsoft DRM and licensing terms of the studios. While this is a DRM issues, it’s more about crappy implementation. You ever hear of an iTunes movie or song failing to play? I believe Hacking Netflix Mike had a similar issue when playing a *regular* DVD the other day. Sounds like a video card driver update might help.
As an aside, Amazon Unbox is great in that you can download the content/licenses as many times as you want. Amazon stores a locker of your purchases. So it may be worth running the reset utility and see what happens.
#11 by Davis on January 3, 2008 - 8:06 am
@Anon – Something does feel very anti-trust about this. I’m not allowed to use the service until I disable competitors files? Something seems fundamentally wrong about this type of arrangement.
@Lachlan – I hear you on boycotting the DRM and in all fairness, I knew that there would be DRM problems when I did buy my Amazon movies, but I also like to support innovation and being able to download a film off the net is a pretty cool feature. I could just keep my internet video consumption underground, but ideally I’d like to live in a world where I can buy a movie anytime I want straight off the net. While boycotting the DRM is a fair way to deal with this type of DRM, it doesn’t do a lot to encourage the studios to open up their business model and provide content that I don’t mind paying for.
@Adam – I completely agree, there is no reason why my Netflix files should have to talk with my Amazon files. If the studios want to be protected from hacking, then they should at least be required to allow their multiple forms of DRM to work together.
@Brent – Good idea about Hacking Netflix, I’ll shoot Mike an email if he doesn’t end up seeing it. I know that he hates DRM as much as I do.
http://www.hackingnetflix.com/2007/12/i-still-really.html
As far as Netflix getting involved though, I doubt that there is really a lot that they can do. The tech guy on the phone was very good at being sympathizing with me over the problem. I think that if it was up to them, they would be more than happy to do without the layer of DRM. Eventually, Netflix was able to help me better understand the issues, but I’m not very optimistic that Netflix can help me when its really the studios telling them to disable high def computers.
Hi Neal – Unfortunately I am using Vista. When I first started shopping around for a computer, it was the only program that was available at the retail level. After having success with Vista on a new laptop, I didn’t expect to have any problems when I upgraded my desktop. Unfortunately, I was wrong and wasn’t aware of this HD issue. Since I’m not going be getting rid of my computer, I now have the choice of living without Netflix or trying to take back my monitor and exchange it for an inferior product.
#12 by Scott on January 3, 2008 - 8:13 am
I’m trying to be more constructive than just “DUH!”. You have to understand that it is people like you who put money into these horrible schemes that perpetuate them!
Just stop. Use Bittorrent. Don’t feel bad about it. It’s your civic duty. Educating CEOs is a time consuming and expensive process. It’s taken ten years on the music side, probably it will take another 5 years on the movie side before they wise up and just start providing unencumbered files to paying customers.
As for your library — your only chance is to get those files free and clear of DRM via FairUse4WM. Which will probably be a huge pain involving a lost weekend and reading hundreds of forum posts. And in the future, don’t spend money on DRM!!!!
#13 by Coutch on January 3, 2008 - 8:24 am
Hey Davis,
Just stop using Netfix..
/ Duh!
// Duh Again!!
#14 by GuyMac on January 3, 2008 - 8:57 am
Actually, sounds like a great reason to not use a Microsoft Operating System at all.
#15 by John on January 3, 2008 - 9:18 am
Don’t buy products from people who consider you a thief for doing so – if they trust you so little they think they need to add DRM, you have no reason at all to trust them either.
#16 by Dave Zatz on January 3, 2008 - 9:34 am
Scott, quite a few folks using BitTorrent -as you suggest- ended up paying the music industry ~$3k. Will you bankroll Davis’ legal fund?
#17 by Alex on January 3, 2008 - 9:40 am
I had a similar problem recently where I could not for the life of me get software that I had purchased to work, and the fastest/easiest “fix” ended up being to literally download pirated versions. It’s just amazing to me that purchasing products for consumers has slowly become more problematic than stealing! It’s just insane to punish consumers like this and I simply don’t understand the logic behind it.
#18 by Davis on January 3, 2008 - 9:45 am
@Coutch – If I stopped using Netflix, it certainly would solve my problem, but I LOVE Netflix and shouldn’t have to give up features, just because I want a monitor capable of displaying high def.
@GuyMac – If I was using a Mac instead of my Windows Vista PC, I still wouldn’t be able to stream Netflix movies. Because Mr. Jobs refuses to license his DRM to Netflix, Apple has created an even more closed system than my Microsoft/HD related setup.
@Scott – Even beyond the legal liability of using pirated movies, the bit torrent experience still leaves quite a bit to be desired. If I use Netflix, I’ll always (unless I upgrade my HD monitor apparently) be able to see the movies that I want at a reasonable resolution with minimal waiting. When it comes to pirated files, I may end up having to wait three days for something to download, only to find out that it’s a Ron Paul campaign video or some kind of internet virus. While I do like the competitive pressure that bit torrent places on the movie studios, I would still rather pay for content and know that I’m going to get what I asked for without exposing myself to copyright lawsuits or internet STDs.
#19 by Scott on January 3, 2008 - 10:11 am
@Dave – I think your statement is not correct. The closest to a lawsuit against BitTorrent users was last year when HBO sent letters to people seeding Rome, Sopranos, etc. You’re thinking of KaZaA w/ music, whereas we’re talking about BitTorrent and tv/movies.
I wouldn’t worry about it. The studios aren’t suing BitTorrent users and if they do start, we’ll all hear about it. For now they seem content to go after thepiratebay.org and leave the users alone.
#20 by John on January 3, 2008 - 10:28 am
Your issue is Vista. The simple answer is to switch back to Windows XP and you won’t have the issue with the whole video downgrading thing. Vista is *LOADED* with DRM that gets in your way if you purchase or watch any HD video content. (Note that, ironically, if you download the HD content from file sharing sites, you won’t have any of these problems.)
#21 by Joel on January 3, 2008 - 11:08 am
Aye, this sounds precisely like the warnings I was hearing about Vista before it launched. If there’s an unregistered, unchipped, or unstable component anywhere in your machine that doesn’t play perfect with DRM, your machine will stop playing movies. Or possibly media of any kind. Prior to Vista, machines were designed to handle almost anything they could, up to and including very brief power outages. Now? The slightest fluctuation causes the OS (Vista) to have a hissy fit, despite the machine being fine.
Upgrade to XP to solve your problem.
#22 by snarkolepsy on January 3, 2008 - 11:10 am
We wound up downgrading out of vista. For the tune of around 200 bucks. (if I recall correctly) We had to buy the XP disk, and then pay for the Vista disk. In the rare event MS actually fixed the OS to be workable. Even though the machine was shipped with Vista. It drove me nuts there was no option to buy a machine with XP at the time.
I’m not sure if that will solve your problem – or just hurt your wallet since we just use unbox. Just an FYI.
#23 by Fred von Lohmann on January 3, 2008 - 11:34 am
I’m afraid “Scott”, above, is misinformed. Since 2004, the MPAA companies have filed thousands of lawsuits against Bit Torrent users who have allegedly used the protocol to infringe copyright (remember, most Bit Torrent applications simultaneously upload as they download, which is how they catch you). The MPAA has also been seizing user records from Bit Torrent indexing sites that it has sued.
For some early coverage of the MPAA lawsuits, see EFF’s page:
#24 by BahamutZaero on January 3, 2008 - 11:50 am
Boycotting these products is not the answer. All that will do is get them to shut it down due to ‘lack of interest’.
You want to make a change? Then enjoy the services, and let the companies know constantly – mail them once a day – about how many problems you are having using their service. Assure them of your love for the service, and how you are so tired of its unending problems.
Show companies like Netflix and Amazon that they can be part of the solution by helping Hollywood come up with a REAL solution – not a half assed, buggy, bad one like DRM / COPP.
#25 by dantheserene on January 3, 2008 - 1:34 pm
” my real problems were actually tied to the shiny new monitor that I’ve already grown fond of”
No, it isn’t. Your problems are the crappy (is there any other kind?) DRM being inflicted on you, and using Vista.
#26 by jeanbgrenouille on January 3, 2008 - 3:39 pm
I have XP service pack 2 running through my 62″ DLP and have not been able to play watch it now movies for quite a while. I have have never run vista and have no other DRM as I hate the stuff. So, its not just a problem with Vista.
#27 by Lexington on January 3, 2008 - 5:34 pm
When you buy content from the entertainment establishment, part of your money goes to the RIAA and the MPAA. Here’s what you get in return:
1. Laws that extend copyright beyond all reasonable bounds (originally 14 years, now life of the creator 70 years) These are not required to promote creativity. They are here to protect Mickey Mouse, and the ‘estates’ of dead artists that continue to leach off the culture without providing anything in return.
2. Laws like the DMCA that allow publishers to subvert your fair use rights by slapping on a layer of flimsy DRM that can’t be circumnavigated without breaking the law EVEN FOR USE THAT IS ALLOWED BY LAW.
3. Penal codes that allow a $250,000 fine for sharing a single .mp3. You can commit vehicular manslaughter and get away with a lower fine. (I promise you, it wasn’t concerned citizens who insisted on that sort of draconian punishment.)
4. Trade agreements that require operators of CD plants in foreign nations to submit to government inspections (imagine that, after winning to Cold War, we’re now insisting that the Russians start policing their own presses on our behalf.)
The list goes on. The fact is, when you buy entertainment at full retail, you support some very unsavory practices. This is not meant to justify piracy (a pure boycott would be the more ethical choice.) Rather, it should serve as a reminder that you simply cannot buy entertainment in a fashion that does not entail encroachments on your basic liberties and dignity. There’s environmental fallout from every minute you consume (at full retail.)
The short story is that, in spite of the freedom granted by the first amendment, the entertainment companies are profoundly undemocratic in their regard for individual liberty. Their desire for control of the user experience is absolutely boundless, and they will sue the daylights out of anything that crosses their paths, even if its tangential to their business. Xerox got sued for creating the copy machine. Sony got sued for creating the Betamax. Napster got sued for popularizing P2P. ANYTHING that can be used to distribute culture in any form is instinctively regarded as a threat by the content industry, at least until it can be brought under control and turned into an exclusive revenue stream. And how for will they go to ‘protect’ these streams? Just ask the Girl Scouts, who got sues for failing to pay royalties on songs sung around the campfire.
Some people call this evil. A better description is primitive. Understanding how to operate in a free culture is as challenging as learning how to govern with the consent of the governed. This is not, traditionally, something that Kings were good at. Only when threatened by bloody revolution do they back off and concede ground. And, revolution by revolution, tyranny is slowly replaced by democracy. Well, currently content is King. And like most Kings, it has been abusing its position terribly.
Now, it is fighting to maintain its dominance, but the people aren’t backing down. And nor should they. Not until the King has renounced some of his more despotic practices, and has decided to serve the needs of free culture instead of invading every corner it can find and gouging people for admission at every turn.
#28 by Hal on January 3, 2008 - 10:10 pm
As long as you’re using DRM crippled content, you are encouraging companies to keep doing this. By buying movies that give you less instead of more and that can be controlled by the company issuing them, you are saying it’s okay to let them control what you watch and don’t watch.
For example, look what Major League Baseball did:
Customers who had spent a lot of money were suddenly no longer able to play their videos of baseball games. Whenever you are buying a DRM controlled file, you are buying something that could be rendered useless if the seller goes out of business or, as in the case with Wal Mart (recently), decides to no longer be in that line of business.
I’m sorry for your problem, but you walked right into this trap by letting someone else, anyone else, but especially a company with a record like Microsoft, decide what you own and don’t own and what files on your computer they control.
#29 by Kees on January 3, 2008 - 11:35 pm
DRM is not only on Vista. It is on XP too. It’s bound to the Windows Media player.
#30 by DRMJustSayNo on January 4, 2008 - 1:39 am
Just say no to puchasing any content with DRM. You will always be punished. Like you I tried to do the right thing and purchase my content, only to suffer lost content and technical problems as a result. Never again.
#31 by Stefan Holmes on January 4, 2008 - 2:05 am
This story surprised the hell out of me! I assumed that the talk about DRM being grossly limiting was all FUD. I can’t believe a company such as Netflix has been so short-sighted as to restrict their movies in this way (there are various ways they can alternately restrict them, such as not allowing copying or transfer of the files themselves).
I will never bump into any such problems because all the HD and most of the SD content I watch (at full HD on my non-HDCP monitor) is illegally obtained. It’s long been a joke in the PC gaming community that pirate games are more easily accessible (and have better functionality, in many cases) than shop-bought originals. The only exceptions to this are internet multilpayer games, which generally will not work without a valid license.
I don’t condone piracy in all forms, but if I want to watch a film in HD I can only download it. My monitor, not supporting HDCP, will cause DRM issues if I try to go legitimate and purchase either a BluRay or HDDVD drive. The problem worsens for my Xbox. If I buy the HDDVD add-on, my movies will probably get downgraded because my Xbox hooks up to my monitor via component.
When DRM goes completely away, studios are going to get a shock because people like me (and there must be more than a few!) are actually going to start buying their films.
#32 by Jonathan on January 4, 2008 - 2:27 am
Before deciding who the bad guys are, and who to point the finger at in this case, would perhaps be helpful to understand how DRM is actually implemented.
DRM has two components. The first is a policy or rules framework which enables rights owners to define how content can be used, moved, copied, viewed, at what resolution etc. The second component is a software layer which then implements those rules and ensures the rules are enforced all the way through the content delivery pipe.
With the above in mind then the situation faced by Davis is almost certainly related to how Netflix have chosen to implement their DRM polices (Or are being forced to by the original rights owners.) The test for this is simple. Both Netflix and Amazon use the Microsoft DRM framework. If Davis’ Unbox videos still play on his new HD enabled system then clearly Amazon have chose to implement a more liberal set of DRM policies. If the Amazon Unbox media still play then the culprit is Netflix (Or the rights owners.), no one else.
Microsoft does not decide what you own and what you can do with right protected media. The rights owners do. It is the rights owners who set the specifications for DRM software as it is implemented on any system, be it an operating system like XP or Vista or a disc format like BlueRay or HD DVD. When Microsoft was developing Vista the media companies set the requirements for how premium (HD) content needed to be protected. The choice was a simple one: either implement those requirements or produce an operating system which is unable to serve premium content to your customers. If you want to see just who is in control go look at debacle over connecting media pcs to HD digital cable or satellite feeds.
Finally, one of the major reasons why Apple choose not to license their DRM has everything to do with the rules set by the rights holders. Right holders demand that any approved DRM system be able to revoke a users rights at any stage in the delivery pipe and that premium content is protected from leakage through unauthorized HD outputs. Apple have a closed hardware ecosystem; they control all the components in the media delivery pipe, hardware and software. With this closed approach they can more easily provide the rights holders with the guarantees they need. The software engineering required to meet rights holder’s DRM requirements in an open ecosystem is several orders of magnitude harder than for a closed system. Of course the fact that iTunes is tied to iPod hardware sales is also another compelling reason
I hope this helps.
#33 by KLM on January 4, 2008 - 2:37 am
People, what are you complaining about?? USE VHS!!! THE BEST FORMAT EVER!!
#34 by Andy D on January 4, 2008 - 3:00 am
BahamutZaero wrote :
Boycotting these products is not the answer. All that will do is get them to shut it down due to ‘lack of interest’.
I think you miss the point. That’s what the pro-freedom contingency wants to see happen. I would like Digital Restrictions Management crippled services die and be replaced by services that let me see content — at a price — but on any computer or home cinema system.
#35 by Talon on January 4, 2008 - 3:01 am
I can’t say for sure, but I’d bet XP would have the same problem. Netflix requires WMP11 with a specific version:
“Windows Media Player version 11 (DRM version 5145) or later”
I have no love for Vista and still use XP also, but unfortunately XP is infected in this way as well.
#36 by mac on January 4, 2008 - 3:12 am
They’ve managed to use their terrible lawsuit strategy to scare me away from “illegal” downloads (except when I’m on wireless in another place, of course).
But because the record companies and movie studios have absolutely no clue about how to do real business via the internet, I simply refuse to do business with them.
Sure, I’ve got a gap of several years now between what I want and what I have but, after all, it’s only entertainment and I have found that I actually can live without their products altogether.
#37 by Stuart on January 4, 2008 - 3:16 am
Whilst I feel sorry for the author, I am wondering why anyone would agree to purchase something if they knew beforehand that the vendor could turn it off at any time?
You wouldn’t buy a car if the dealer kept a remote-controlled killswitch… so why do people do exactly that with DRM-protected movies or music?
Even if the music/movie industry had a track record of showing goodwill to their customers (I’ll leave that question open…
you still have to rely on fairly brittle technical arrangements to be able to watch/listen to music/movies that you have paid for.
Stuart
#38 by Chad Z. hower on January 4, 2008 - 3:16 am
Hmm… Sounds familiar:
Piracy and Unconventional Wisdom
http://www.codeproject.com/KB/architecture/UnconventialWisdom.aspx
#39 by memals on January 4, 2008 - 4:03 am
KLM: you mean of course betamax
#40 by CommonSense on January 4, 2008 - 6:35 am
How about running a “clean” virtual instance of the OS? Maybe VMWare? You can get a copy of the server product for free. This would remove the concern over Netflix needing to scan any of your files. Their scan would be limited to the virtual hard disc only.
#41 by Tom on January 4, 2008 - 8:24 am
Your statement about not being able to use Netflix due to Apple “refusing to share” their FairPlay DRM system with Netflix is slightly inaccurate.
Netflix, like most of the DRM-wanting companies, decided to go with the Windows Media platform, which Microsoft hasn’t made fully workable on the Mac.
WM was seen as “better” than FairPlay, mostly because the movie studios could then charge variable prices for content, *revoke customer access to purchased content based on their hardware choices* (exactly what Vista is doing to you now), etc.
#42 by Payam Minoofar on January 4, 2008 - 11:00 am
I agree with everyone who says that we ought to put our money where our mouths are. When Apple introduced the “plus” tracks with no DRM, I bought them. I operate a business, http://www.walki-talki.com that sells DRM free mp3 files. I use a Mac, of course, but Unix is the future. If people don’t want to shell out money for Mac, they should consider some flavor of Unix. The open source community has put together some fabulous infrastructure for the distribution of music, Amarok, for example.
It is critical for the industry to understand that DRM is an economic loser. If it succeeds the consumer lose. This is an opportunity the consumer cannot let pass.
#43 by Michael Davis on January 4, 2008 - 11:46 am
You said: When I ran COPP to identify the error on my machine, it gave me an ominous warning that “the exclusive semaphere is owned by another process.â€
It probably said “semaphore”, and I know what that means. A semaphore is a way for programs to lock certain resources, such as an area of memory or a file, in cases where many programs might want to use the same resources. For example, two programs might share the same area of memory so that they can communicate with each other. When one wants to write to that area, it obtains a semaphore for it so that the two programs don’t try to write at the same time.
That’s a very general error message that any program could report.
The fact that this error happened shows that COPP is poorly designed and/or buggy.
#44 by TerryC on January 4, 2008 - 1:21 pm
“Since I’m not going be getting rid of my computer, I now have the choice of living without Netflix or trying to take back my monitor and exchange it for an inferior product.”
There is another choice. I suspect that your computer & monitor would work just fine with Windows XP. XP is still readily available. Maybe be the time the next version of Windows comes out Hollywood will have realize their error, or be irrelevant.
#45 by WTL on January 4, 2008 - 3:38 pm
Just out of curiosity, have you tried dropping your resolution down to say 1280×1024 (or something in that range)? Your monitor should scale it up to fill the screen, and *maybe* the DRM would let the movie play at a lower resolution.
I haven’t tried this, but it might work.
#46 by Davis on January 4, 2008 - 6:43 pm
-Thanks for catching my typo Michael, you are right it is buggy software.
-I just may end up making the upgrade to XP Terry. It’s certainly looking like a more attractive option. My only reservation is that I really like Media Center Vista and Media Center on XP is not so hot. How evil is it that even though I’m not allowed to watch Netflix, I’m apparently still allowed to use Microsoft’s own software? I can even record HDTV OTA streams and automatically strip out the commercials, but I can’t use one of my favorite features about Netflix.
-Thanks for the suggestion WTL, but still no Netflix.
#47 by jonson roth on January 4, 2008 - 9:54 pm
I know I sound like a dinosaur but it’s for reasons like this that I prefer buying discs. It’s easy, i can reuse the discs on a different computer and screen (or player), etc.
#48 by Davis on January 4, 2008 - 10:15 pm
Not a dinosaur Jonson, it’s just your preferred method of consumption. There are lots of advantages to DVD. You don’t have to deal with stuff like this, you always own the movie (until it gets too scratched up anyway) and you can use it in a gazillion consumer devices. Even though I love internet video, I still look forward to my Netflix discs each weekend.
#49 by Michael on January 5, 2008 - 5:33 am
Are you telling me that this comes as a surprise to you?
#50 by Theo on January 5, 2008 - 5:41 am
Hey Davis, try this!
Get another monitor and use it as the primary… then simply move the offended window to that HD monitor and continue playback.
I know you may still have problems but it is worth a try.
@Whomever – Netflix does NOT require Media Player 11 – I have 10 installed and it works beautifully
*shrugs* Maybe it’s just me!
Good luck Davis!