Rhapsody And The Art Of The Up-Sell
Photo by Thomas Hawk
One of my very first jobs was working behind a concession counter for a big multi-plex cinema. It isn’t the sort of place where one would expect to learn a life skill, but early on I learned an important lesson in business, the art of the up-sell.
You see, movie theaters make very little from the box office receipts, so the concessions counter is the lifeblood of the industry. The setup is pretty much the same at every theater, but most people don’t tend to think about it. Because the actual cost of the popcorn and soda is so low, the theaters reap big profits from selling captive customers overpriced snacks and beverages.
One of the problems that theaters face, is that there are a ton of people who tend to order small sizes. It could be that they are trying to save money or that they don’t need oversized portions, but because the containers cost the theater more than the actual popcorn or soda, going from a small to a larger size, tends to be pure profit for the theater.
To help “encourage” movie goers to pay the max, theaters will price their small popcorns at ridiculously expensive levels and then have a minor jump in price from small to medium and medium to large. If you were to price the popcorn by ounce, a small would cost four times as much as a large, but because of the high cost at the small level, it makes it easier to convince consumers to pay a little bit extra for a lot more food.
When I sold concessions, the sales pitch would typically go “hey did you know you can get a large for only 50 cents extra?” That was all it took and at least 75% of the customers would go big.
In thinking about why my theater was so effective at up-selling, two things jump out at me. The first has to do with the way the pricing was set. Consumers got tremendously more value at the higher levels, then the lower ones. It might be tough convincing someone to spend $5 on a bucket of popcorn to begin with, but once they made that purchase, an extra 10% for 200% more, seems small. Secondly though, they had an actual human explain this value to the customer. Concession employees were expected to upsell or suggestive sell on every single transaction. It could be subtle, but management made sure that every employee was at least presenting more options to the customers.
What made me take this trip down memory lane is a recent experience with Real’s Rhapsody music service. Before the internet, napster, and digitization, I used to collect music with a passion. Records, Tapes, CDs, it didn’t matter. I would scour local garage sales and thrift stores looking for bargains, (not to mention all of the BMG and Columbia House memberships.)
When the internet first started to take off, my collecting habits intensified. I’d surf Ebay for favorite artists. I didn’t care about the singles or the greatest hits, I was after the rare B-sides that were released internationally. There is something amazing about listening to an artist’s entire discography in order, but back then, it took a lot of money to buy every single song that an artist produced.
Once MP3′s took off, I abandoned physical playback and spent many late nights digitizing my music. As time has gone on though, I’ve realized what a hassle it is trying to maintain a large digital library. Computers have a way of freaking out once you go over a certain limit, there are countless hard drive failures involving added expenses and I don’t even want to think about the amount of time I’ve spent dealing with buffer overrun errors while backing up my music. The bottom line is that if you’re trying to collect a couple hundred thousand Mp3′s, it’s not only cheaper to rent then it is to buy, it’s cheaper just to store it.
Because I had such a large music collection, I never gave Rhapsody a chance, but as one hard drive failure after another has taken large chunks out of my music library, I’ve found myself turning to the internet for specific artists or songs that I’m now missing.
Over the last year, I’ve signed up for Rhapsody three different times to listen to music that’s disappeared over time. Thanks to their free trial offers, I’ve been able to hear a lot of great music, but never kept my membership for longer than a month.
What surprised me so much about the experience was how much I enjoyed it. Not only can I get the latest top hits for a fraction of what I used to spend, but I also get access to the expensive b-sides that were never in wide circulation. The first time I logged onto the service, I was estactic after discovering an entire album’s worth of material from my favorite artist.
Given how much enjoyment I’ve gotten out of the service, one would think that it would be a no brainer for me to spend a modest amount of money for access to more music then you can even think about, but when it came down to becoming a paying member, Real Networks lost me on the up-sell.
You see, as a streaming internet music service, Rhapsody really is an amazing product, but its lack of a robust download solution, means that if you want to take your music on the go, customers have limited options. Since Real realizes that not every consumer wants downloadable functionality, they price their service in two tiers.
The first is the standard all you can eat streaming music of just about any song or artist you can think of (we’re talking stuff not even on Bit Torrent.) For $2 more though, you can download songs to “approved devices” and rock out using a portable device that doesn’t need to be connected to the net.
As an internet streaming service, I would have been happy to pay their monthly fee for all of the music that they provide, but by offering a download “upgrade”, it makes me keenly aware of a significant limitation to the service. As is, I can listen to Pandora via the internet now, so a streaming only service makes me second guess how much value Rhapsody really has. I wouldn’t even mind paying the $2 more per month just for streaming access, but don’t see enough value in the $2 upgrade to justify signing up for the downloading tier.
Part of this is because I’m not able to download a DRM free MP3. Even if you download your music, you still have to “refresh” your approved device once a month or your songs get disabled. You’re also limited in the number of devices you can play your Real files on.
As much as I prefer downloading over streaming, it simply isn’t worth an extra $24 per year for a weaksauce version of the real thing. Having to connect my cell phone to the net once a month is obnoxious and I’m not particularly fond of downloading music that I can’t play on all the electronic gadgets that I own.
If they eliminated the download tier, I’d probably be a customer right now, but by making me choose, they’ve persuaded me not to sign up for either package.
Not everyone purchased an up-sell when I sold concessions, but during my entire time behind the counter, I never had a single customer walk away without at least buying the small popcorn that they originally asked for. When it comes to Rhapsody though, the different pricing tiers have cost them at least one customer who would have paid, if he didn’t have to choose between streaming only or weaksauce downloading.
I don’t know if Real does consumer surveys, but I bet that I’m not the only one to agonize over this distinction. Instead of using the price difference to highlight their weaknesses, Real would be better off by either raising the price $2 on everyone and then including their downloading solutions with the service or eliminate the downloading tier entirely and focus on being an amazing and comprehensive streaming service only. By trying to straddle between streaming and downloading, they are only confusing customers and highlighting the limitations to their service.
Posted on July 20th, 2009 by Davis
Filed under: DRM, Music, Netflix, SA, Technology
I can’t get past the idea that if I stop paying I loose all my music. I’ve never bought a TiVo without a lifetime subscription (well I did once when I had no choice but moved it to lifetime as soon as that option came back).
I hate, hate, hate, knowing I have yet another monthly bill in order to use a product I like. Same goes for iPhone. I’d rather pay MORE now (full price) than have a subsidized phone that I have to pay a penalty to get out of.
The other thing is I spend an enormous time setting up playlists. If I chose to abandon a service, I’d loose my playlists and have to set them up anew on my next service. That’s a no go! I only want music that is DRM-free that I can purchase, use anywhere and that will ALWAYS be mine without having to pay monthly randsom’s to enjoy!
…Dale
(P.S. – wish I didn’t have to fill in your Name/Mail/Website fields every time I left a comment Davis. Too bad there isn’t a service out there that could assist me as a commentor!
)
You really brought up a key point I hadn’t thought of before – and it has been a stop for me buying the service too.
It is almost like walking into a store, grabbing some milk, and then as you are pulling out your wallet, the cashier tells you all the bad things about milk and how you can spend just a little more money on organic rice milk.
Grocery stores would never do that, because although a good percentage of people may upgrade, too many would just put down the milk and not buy anything.
As a consumer, you don’t want to be reminded of the downsides of what you are buying. You want your buying decision to be reinforced and supported so you feel you are making a wise choice.
@Dale – I wish I knew of some kind of commenting service that would make it easier for my readers to share there thoughts, if only there was a service out there that did something like that . . . in the meantime stay tuned as I play around with more plugins to see if I can improve on my current comment setup.
@ Scott Elkin – You could not have said it better. It’s not that I don’t want milk, I just don’t want to know about all the chemicals that they used to keep it cheap. Give me an everything on demand streaming service and I’ll look past the no download limitations. If Netflix tried to charge $2 more for DRM downloads, I’d probably face just as tough of a decision.
seems an odd backhanded logic to me. If you want downloaded music you own for life then of course paying money per month just for access is silly. I do wish Rhapsody worked with iPods though
That to me is the big glaring hassle – but as always that comes down to Apple and fairplay that close Rhapsody off, not the other way around.
I chose streaming for one simple reason – I have 2 daughters tha t consume new music at a very fast clip. If I was to have then do that on a .99 cents per song basis and did not limit them then 100$ a month would be very normal.
This way they get all the music they want and I get a known bill that does not vary. as for buying the songs anyway – fallout boy is considered old hat to them, why even bother having bought it.
I agree it’s not very logical, but as a consumer I reserve my right to behave in unpredictable ways. I’m not really hung up on the rent vs. own issue as much as I am paying an extra $2 a month just so that my music is portable. Whenever, I go to make that choice, the part of my that made me sign up for Rhapsody in the first place shirks away while my brain keeps thinking that I’m getting screwed out of $2 per month. Of course I could take the streaming only option instead, but $2 is so little money that it makes me at least consider the download and that is where I’m getting paralyzed by too much choice. Netflix saw similar behavior when the added half star rankings to their site. Consumers wouldn’t rate the movie at all when they had to pick on a 1 – 10 scale instead of 1 – 5. You’re right that it doesn’t make sense, but it’s a problem that a lot of businesses face.
FYI: rhapsody is price matching Napster’s $5 plan.