Redbox Quitely Testing Hand Gun Kiosks

April 1st, 2008 Davis

After pulling their R rated movies from all McDonald’s locations, Redbox has come up with a creative solution for filling the inventory void left behind. Instead of stocking their popular Redbox kiosks with more G rated movies, they’ve decided to jump into a new market and will begin renting 9mm hand guns at their popular $1 per night price point. In a statement to the Inside Redbox blog, Redbox PR spokeperson Tommy G describes the program as a way to make Redbox customers feel safer at some of their “rougher” Redbox locations.

“with recent reports of violence at some of our ‘rougher’ locations, Redbox wanted to help ensure our customers’ safety so, we added this option in some of these areas to test out the idea. It is unfortunate that this customer found out about this before it was ready to be released to the public. Rest assured that we are doing everything we can to make our customers’ experience at Redbox the best it can be.”

It’s hard to know how popular handgun rentals will be, but if Redbox has success with the program, I bet we’ll see Netflix work out a loaner program with the post office to compete.

Posted in Kiosks, Disclosure - I own stock in co. mentioned, Netflix | 1 Comment »

From Rental To Retail - Blockbuster Begins Evoloution Towards New Rental Paradigm

November 14th, 2007 Davis

New Paradigm

Over the last few years, I’ve followed the DVD rental industry pretty closely. During that time, I’ve been one of Blockbuster’s biggest critics and have frequently blasted the company for failing to adapt to the digital age. With their core rental business experiencing massive deterioration, I’ve had very few positive things to say about the company.

Their hyper-focus on competing with Netflix, has cost the company dearly and was a huge blunder by Blockbuster’s previous management. In order to try and counteract Netflix’s momentum, Blockbuster ended late fees, started a price war against a well funded innovator with little debt, and they massively cannibalized their higher margin in-store business. All in a desperate attempt, to differentiate their online service. Meanwhile, their executives took home pay packages that were unconscionable, especially when you consider Blockbuster’s dwindling resources and their dismal financial performance.

At the end of the day, their fight against Netflix has cost them at least a half a billion dollars and they still only have 3,000,000 subscribers.

Six months ago, I would have told you that there was nothing that Blockbuster could do to save itself. I had seen Antioco and Co. make too many poor decisions, to believe that they could figure out how to turn the company around. Instead of increasing prices, they were lowering them by offering unlimited total access rentals. While the program proved to be popular with consumers and the Mad Money crowd, it wasn’t an acceptable long term solution for the challenges that Blockbuster faces.

Of all the decisions that I’ve seen the company make, squeezing out Antioco may have been their best one. Ironically, the one move that I think was good for shareholders, turned Mad Money against them and started the spiral towards a new 52 week low today.

With so much going wrong for the company, I had low expectations when they brought in Jim Keyes to takeover at the helm. With the future of rentals being digital, I didn’t immediately appreciate the importance of bringing in a retail specialist.

Over the past few months, I’ve watched as Keyes has taken over and while it will take him time to steer Blockbuster back on course, his immediate move to cut advertising and unlimited rentals was one that made economic sense.

What a lot of people interpreted as Blockbuster refusing to face reality, I saw as an admission that they had lost their focus on their most profitable customers. In the short term, this is a good thing because it helps to stem the losses from the Total Access program, but it’s not a long term solution.

Following Blockbuster’s 3rd quarter earning’s call, I could understand why their shareholders might be nervous, but after listening to Keyes unveil his turnaround strategy at their analyst event, I was shocked to see such a negative market reaction to his ideas. Analysts slammed the event as being big on dreams and light on details and since the event, Blockbuster’s market cap has taken a 20% haircut.

What other’s may have interpreted as bad news, I saw as a stroke of genius. Keyes’ prescription for saving Blockbuster is the exact remedy that they need, in order to remain relevant in a digital age. There is little doubt that there will come a time where we see the end of the DVD rental, but for the first time, Blockbuster is willing to admit this and they laid out a compelling plan for how they will adjust to this transition.

Keyes discussed several initiatives, but at the heart of the strategy was a plan to evolve from a rentailer to a retailer. While the differences may be subtle, the details have tremendous implications on the viability of Blockbuster’s business model.

Dedicate More Square Footage To Retail

While Blockbuster has seen their brutal selloff, shares of Gamestop have caught on fire. The market clearly has no faith in the future of DVD rentals, yet they are still willing to invest in profitable retailers. The rental industry is a tough business and as that stream dries up, Blockbuster needs to be able to replace this with higher profit opportunities.

In order to accomplish this goal, Keyes has worked out an agreement with Sony to provide 2000 PS3 kiosks, in their stores during the holidays. I view this as an an early test for the viability of Blockbuster’s retail approach. I believe that the consoles will sell well among Blockbuster’s customer base and will lead towards more high end consumer electronics.

By focusing on selling higher ticket items, Blockbuster stands a better chance of covering their fixed costs. People are already going to Blockbuster to rent their movies, but if they can start to buy things like computers, cellular phones, HDTV’s and Blu-Ray players, it will give Blockbuster an opportunity to capture some of the money that retailers like Best Buy are able to take in.

If Blockbuster is successful with this transition, they could even get to a point where they could use rentals as a loss leader to drive higher revenue transactions. If you can sell enough HDTV’s, the decline in rental revenues becomes less of an issue. What some might see as the abandonment of the rental market is really Blockbuster pursuing better market opportunities.

Invest In Kiosk Technology

It’s no secret that I believe that burn on demand could save the DVD rental industry. As a tech savvy consumer, I have lots of options for streaming digital content to my television, but most people still prefer the good old fashioned DVD. Even after the digital revolution gains critical mass, there will still be a need for movie rentals. While it’s easy to believe that everyone has a computer and internet access, there is still a large part of the market that VOD and Netflix, can’t get at.

The problem with Blockbuster’s retail initiatives, is that this will eat into the selection and inventory. If half the store is dedicated to selling consumer electronics, it becomes challenging to offer as many choices. Burn on demand can solve this issue for Blockbuster. By taking care of the heavy lifting, Blockbuster can make it easy for consumers to watch an even wider range of content.

Keyes plan to invest in burn on demand technology shows that he understands the savings and impact, that this technology can have. My only reservation about his approach, is his intention to introduce the kiosks at the store level. Kiosks can provide a lot of efficiencies, but they don’t do well with volume. I can see the potential in letting franchisees use the technology in non-video store locations, but believe that Blockbuster needs a different solution at the store level.

Everybody knows how to work a printer at the supermarket, but there is a reason why people still go to Kinkos. They can handle volume like nobody’s business.

Burn on demand kiosks will be good for expanding into supermarkets, coffee shops and fast food restaurants, but Blockbuster will need dedicated servers and lots of burners at the store level, if they want to provide a superior experience at their retail locations. By handling the heavy lifting for consumers, they could bypass a significant technological hurdle in the adoption of burn on demand DVD.

Shifting To More Revenue Sharing Arrangements

One of the biggest weaknesses in Blockbuster’s business model are the high fixed costs that they have to deal with. Blockbuster can’t get rid of the lease payments or all of the employee costs, but they can reduce their leverage by approaching their stuido partners. Whether rental will eventually die or not, the studios want to protect the DVD stream and have an incentive to work with Blockbuster towards ensuring their survival. In order to get less up front costs, Blockbuster will be forced to give up their gross margins, but it will allow them to keep top movies in stock and to offer a burn on demand experience.

Raising Prices and Reinstating Late Fees

Over the past few years, we’ve seen the price of a lot of products go up. Whether it’s higher gas prices or postal rate increases, the cost of living has been increasing. When it comes to rental though, we’ve seen price deteriorate. The DVD price war has taken it’s toll and there is more than enough justification for Netflix and Blockbuster to increase prices. This strategy is probably the most risky, because if Netflix didn’t follow through with their own price increase, there could be a severe reaction against Blockbuster.

One of the things that has always impressed me about Netflix, has been their commitment to testing ideas before implementation. When Blockbuster ended late fees, they took a shotgun approach and hoped that it would pay off. It obviously didn’t.

When Netflix lowered prices it was after they understood the elasticity of the demand curve. By taking their time to react to competitive threats, Netflix was able to make more intelligent decisions in combating Blockbuster. While I’m sure that Blockbuster shareholders would welcome an imediate price increase, I have to admire the fact that Keyes isn’t willing to dive in head first on this one.

As far as the late fees goes, this is clearly a problem. By allowing customers to keep rentals, it’s prevented other people from having access to the inventory. I think it’s fair for Blockbuster to consider this move, but after such a massive no late fee campaign, there could be a strong backlash. One of the problems that I think most people had with Blockbuster’s late charges was the punitive nature of the fees. Instead of having to pay for one more day, you often had to pay for another three day rental.

During the analyst presentation, Keyes expressed admiration for Redbox’s pricing model and pointed out that a $1 a day wasn’t really cheaper then Blockbuster. If Blockbuster had $3 rentals for three days and then a $1 per day afterwards, consumers might accept the return of late fees. Still, after such a massive promotion (and lawsuit settlements), it would be gutsy to try and re-introduce them.

There is no way to know for sure, if any of these initiatives can save Blockbuster, but I do believe that Keyes is making the right moves towards securing the long term future of the company. While I may have written off the video store, I’m not ready to call the end of retail and I’m impressed by Keyes focus on improving revenue per square footage, instead of being distracted by the internet. It’s the right move for Blockbuster to make and one that marks the divergence of the Netflix vs. Blockbuster paradigm. With rental revenues set to eventually expire, Blockbuster is smart in positioning themselves to take on other retailers, where they have an advantage. By making these changes, it shifts the battle to Blockbuster vs. Circuit City, Best Buy and Game Stop and this is a business model that should make more sense to Blockbuster’s investors.

Posted in Movies, DVDs, Kiosks, Disclosure - I own stock in co. mentioned, Netflix | 4 Comments »

Blockbuster <3 Blu-Ray or Shotgun Wedding?

June 27th, 2007 Davis

A Nice Day For A White Wedding

Last week, Blockbuster made a pretty big splash after they announced that they were going to support Blu-Ray exclusively at their retail stores. The move prompted a lot of people to ask if this was a sign that HD-DVD was dead in the water. After all, Blockbuster has a significant retail presence and their support for one format could be interpreted as a sign that consumers are demanding Blu-Ray over HD-DVD.

On the surface, this explanation seems to make sense. Blockbuster even went so far as to tell people that 70% of their test stores were choosing Blu-ray content. Sooner or later Blockbuster was going to have to choose a format and by doing it publicly, they were able to control how that information got out. Irrespective of their motivation, the move was smart on many levels and helped Sony to shift momentum back to Blu-ray, in the never ending format wars.

It could be that this is all there is to this story, that Blockbuster choose their customer’s preferences over corporate interests, but as a conspiracy theorist, I can’t help, but feel that there is more going on, back at Blockbuster HQ.

It’s entirely possible that Blockbuster’s love affair with Blu-Ray was an isolated business decision, but I suspect that Uncle Sony may have brought a shotgun to the wedding, in order to make sure that Blu-ray stayed relevant.

Over the last year, the DVD kiosk market has started to get hot. Consumers may have been skeptical at first, but once they get a taste, they have to come back. By the end of the year, there very well could be close to 10,000 kiosks in North America.

Even though the current kiosks have proven to be popular, Blockbuster and Movie Gallery have largely sat out of the DVD kiosk expansion. It could be that they don’t have the capital to pursue the technology or it may be that they really don’t see a future in kiosk rentals, but I believe, that they’ve been holding out for something even better, burn on demand DVD.

As the DVD kiosk market develops, I think we’ll see two different business models unfold. There will still be the current kiosk that offers a couple dozen choices and an inventory of 500 - 1000 discs and there will be the burn on demand machines that will carry 2,000 - 3,000 different movies that you can burn at the retail level. The current kiosks will be popular because they take a relatively low investment and the owners can control the costs of the content because of the fair use doctrine. If you play your cards right, you can make the kiosk pay for itself in the first year you own it. These are especially well suited for adding DVD rentals to a high traffic locations that normally couldn’t support a video store.

Unfortunately though, for a lot of retailers, the limited capacity of today’s kiosks prevents them from using the technology in more powerful ways. If you can’t replace your entire inventory with a limited number of discs, than it’s hard to convince the video stores and big box retailers to adopt the technology. While today’s technology will play a vital role in the future of the DVD rental market, it will be burn on demand that has the potential to save the video stores from extinction.

To a certain extent, Blockbuster will be interested in using the burn on demand kiosks in order to minimize real estate and cut down on employee costs, but the real benefit of the kiosks will be the new franchising opportunities that will open up to them. As the video store industry has gone into consolidation mode, Blockbuster’s franchisees have had a very difficult time adjusting to the new rental environment. Disagreements over the online program and the end of late fees, has even caused one of their first franchise owners to sue Blockbuster for breach of contract. As the market has collapsed, attracting new capital has been difficult and Blockbuster has struggled in replacing this lost revenue.

One of the problems with the stand alone burn on demand kiosks, is that these will not be cheap. It will take a healthy chunk of capital in order for Blockbuster or Movie Gallery to take advantage of this expanding market. With the introduction of the technology though, Blockbuster can leverage their brand by offering franchisee investors an opportunity to help create a new automated video store network.

This would help to raise outside capital that isn’t dilutive to Blockbuster shareholders, doesn’t increase debt, and would give smaller investors, a direct opportunity to invest in the growth of this emerging market.

When it comes to Blockbuster’s retail stores, I believe that they’ll look less like a kiosk and more like a Kinko’s. Blockbuster would be well served in studying the success that Paul Orfalea has had in building his company. The same concepts that he applied, will be key components for maximizing the success in using the technology. Burn on demand at the store level will need to work like a machine, in order for Blockbuster to provide the optimal retail experience, while minimizing their costs at the same time.

Little things like allowing customers to select a film online and have it available for pick up will matter a lot. They may even be able to charge higher prices by guaranteeing that you can always get the movie that you want. With a server and a couple of fast burners, Blockbuster could reduce the size of their real estate and improve customer selection at the same time.

For Blockbuster the stakes are huge.

Unfortunately though, the stakes for Sony are even bigger and while the technology to deploy burn on demand has been here for a very long time, like anything involving Hollywood, it’s been tied down over disagreements tied to the licensing of formats. Last December, things looked promising, that we might be witnessing the birth of this technology.

Time Warner CEO Dick Parsons said that 2007 would see the introduction of burn on demand technology for their retail partners, the DVD forum even “approved” a standard for the DRM, and in anticipation of the launch, Sonic solutions went as far as to announce that they were launching a commercial and retail solution using the technology. Despite all of these signs of this technological evolution, somehow the licensing discussions got hijacked by the DVD-CCA, and everything started to break down.

While Blockbuster hasn’t publicly discussed their burn on demand ambitions, there have been hints that they’ve had their eyes set on this target. Earlier this month, Lionsgate’s CEO Jon Feltheimer said that the company had digital distribution agreements in place with Best Buy and Blockbuster. Many in the press, assumed that he was referring to a movie download service, but no one stopped to consider whether or not “digital distribution” could occur at the retail level. Later, Feltheimer backed away from the comments, which could be interpreted as a sign of on going discussions.

Many retail and technology companies had hoped that Hollywood could come to a decision, but over the last six months, it’s been nothing but a series of delays. When the group met last April, they still couldn’t resolve their impasse and the decision was put off for another two months, while the studios considered their alternatives.

While there is no way for me to know what goes on behind the closed door DVD-CCA sessions, what I do know from my sources in the kiosk industry, is that the disagreement over the licensing has largely been between the studios, not the consumer electronic companies involved. At one point, Sony was even looking into building their own DVD kiosks, that would burn Sony films exclusively.

This would obviously be a less than ideal solution for consumers and retailers, but it suggests that whatever the core issues are, Sony is concerned enough about them, that they are willing to ostracize their customers, in order to maintain their hold on the DVD market.

What makes me suspect that Sony may have brought a shotgun to Blockbuster’s wedding, is the timing of the announcement of their engagement. It was a week and a half before today’s meeting, where the DVD-CCA, (cough: Sony) will decide whether or not consumers should be able to buy a burn on demand DVD or whether it poses too much of a piracy problem :roll:

Coincidently enough, two days before the meeting, Rimage, also issued a press release where they mentioned their love of “Blu-ray” six different times. Rimage also recently announced a $6.5 million order from an unnamed “national retailer”. Rimage helps to make DVD publishing systems, Sonic makes the DRM.

Now, this is just speculation on my part, but considering that Sony owns half of the patents in the DVD-CCA licensing pool, I’m going to assume that they’ve got some control over what happens with the DVD-CCA. If the DVD-CCA can’t agree on a decision, than it might delay Sony’s digital plans, but it would certainly mean a lot more to a company like say ohhhh I don’t know, Blockbuster? It’s easy to dismiss, Blockbuster’s acceptance of Blu-ray as a day to day business decision, but in the larger context of their digital strategy, I think the move very likely could have been made, to shore up Sony’s support for the burn on demand technology.

While the DVD-CCA did meet today, I haven’t been able to find out the decision. They don’t like a lot of public attention and haven’t posted anything publicly. They did post their support for a law making all DVD copying illegal though. It’s hard to argue with them, I can only imagine how terrible it would be if consumers were allowed to make fair use copies of their content.

It could be that I’m reading entirely too much into this, but after watching Sony destroy their own PS3 with a forced Blu-ray “upgrade”, I wouldn’t put it past the company to try and use their muscle on the DVD-CCA board, in order to squeeze a retail partner like Blockbuster. You can call it payola or you can call it smart business, but it’s hard for me to blame Blockbuster, even if their “support” for Blu-ray may have involved a little tit for tat.

If it unlocks the key to burn on demand, then Blu-ray is a small price to pay, for a real shot at long term survival. Until, the studios can figure out a different economic equation, the video stores won’t survive the commoditization of media.

Update - It looks like it’s official, or at least sort of. I’m not sure if Blockbuster’s support was what it took, but the DVD-CCA finally authorized burn on demand for consumers and retailers. The paperwork won’t be signed until next week, but the move opens the door for a brand new market to unfold. It will take time for the rollout of actual products, but I expect that it won’t take long before we start seeing plenty of retailers adopting the technology. It’s way to early to tell how this market will shake out, but I expect to see lots of competition.

Posted in Media, Movies, Technology, TV, HDTV DVDs, DRM, DVDs, VOD, Kiosks | 5 Comments »

DVDPlay Puts Exclamation Point On Growth Of DVD Kiosk Market

January 16th, 2007 Davis

If it wasn’t already clear that 2006 was a record year for the DVD kiosk industry, DVDPlay has added their own exclamation point to the success of the industry by releasing an update on their own DVD kiosk program.

During 2006, DVDPlay continued to demonstrate phenomenal growth for their brand and now has over 1,000 DVDPlay branded locations, on top of another 1,000 non-branded locations that consumers can rent from. The company also announced that in 2007, they are planning to continue their aggressive rollout of kiosks by adding another 2,000 locations to their program.

Considering that just a year ago, DVDPlay was announcing that they had rented their 4 millionth DVD over the life of their business, it pretty amazing to see them add another 2 million DVD rentals, just over 2006 alone.

With demand from consumers and retailers clearly continuing to increase, DVDPlay is starting to gain serious traction in the market for DVD rentals. In addition to hitting these growth milestones, the company also announced that their rollout into Arizona is almost complete and they now have kiosks located in 90% of all Arizona Safeway stores.

The official word from Safeway is that it’s still too early to gauge the success of these rollouts, but from their comments, it’s clear that even if the machines were running at breakeven, there is still a huge benefit for them to give up 5.5 square feet of their store, in order to be able to offer DVD rentals to their customers.

“Safeway spokeswoman Nikki Daly said its too early to determine how popular the kiosks are with customers. “This is just another way for us to offer convenience to our customers,” she said. Daly said the company phased out video departments in many of its stores because they were too much of a drain on staff and consumed too much space.”

With more and more retailers taking a closer look at offering DVD rentals to their customers, DVDPlay sits in an attractive position to capitalize on this trend. If they do end up tripling the number of kiosk locations by the end of this year, it won’t take long before these developments start having a real economic impact on traditional video stores. While the selection on a kiosk can’t replicate what’s available at a local video store today, the convenience of kiosk rentals and the ability for the industry to deploy machines quickly and cost effectively, could put enormous pressure on an industry that is clearly very much in flux.

So far, grocery stores have been the most likely locations to adopt the DVD kiosk, but the more popular this technology becomes, the greater the potential that this market has to grow . With coffee houses, fast food restaurants, gas stations and quick serve convenience stores still without a DVD rental option, the growth potential of this market is really quite extraordinary. With many retailers only putting their toe in the water during 2006, I expect that we will see significant demand for DVD kiosks increase in 2007.

2006 may have turned out to be a record year for the DVD kiosk industry, but with with all three of the major kiosk players planning aggresive growth in 2007, I have even higher expectations for what we’ll see by the end of this year.

Posted in Movies, DVDs, Kiosks | 1 Comment »

Zoom Kiosks Hacked - Hackers Can’t Resist Free iPods

January 16th, 2007 Davis

BacklightOne of the major advantages to using kiosks at a retail store is the reduction in shrinkage that retailers see, once they introduce kiosks at the retail level. Because customers have to actually pay for a product before they can get their hands on it, vending can save retailers significant amounts of money by reducing the amount of theft from shoplifters and unscrupulous employees. Like anything though, if you give someone enough incentive, people will always figure out a way to get around theft deterrent systems.

When I was a kid, people took the time to figure out a way to short circuit Coke machines into giving away free sodas, by spitting water into the slot for dollar bills. Considering that Zoom systems is catering to a much higher end of the retail market with their iPod and cell phone kiosks, it shouldn’t be much of a surprise that hackers have already figured out a way to get around the theft protections built into the Zoom vending machines.

Because Zoom is using internet explorer to run their kiosk software, hackers have figured out that it’s relatively easy to bypass their security protections by accessing the file explorer window and then tricking the machine into thinking that you’ve already paid.

Since most of the Zoom’s kiosks are either inside of a Macy’s location or in an airport, this limits the effectiveness of this hack because there are still security guards that can watch out for this, but this hack could still undermine the usefulness of kiosk technology, if you have to have physical security monitoring the machines. While I’d be surprised to find out that Zoom hasn’t already responded to this threat by making it more difficult to gain access to the file explorer window, this hack still highlights an important issue for kiosk manufactuers to consider when designing their vending solutions.

By removing an actual human from the transaction process vending can save time and money for many businesses, but without the right theft controls, it can also expose retailers to even higher levels of theft. Even with this exploit, I would still be willing to bet that retailers see significant less shrinkage with Zoom kiosks than without them, but for a technology that depends upon removing humans from the transaction process, these sorts of exploits are a significant threat to the kiosk industry. If retailers can’t feel comfortable in having an unmonitored vending machine selling their inventory, it will greatly diminish the appeal and convenience that vending can have as a retail solution.

Posted in Technology, Kiosks | 8 Comments »

Single Zoom Kiosk Sells $55,000 Worth Of iPods In Just 1 Month

December 28th, 2006 Davis

Hot ProductHot Product Hosted on Zooomr

Setting the gold standard for the kiosk industry, Zoom Systems has revealed that they’ve taken in $55,000 worth of iPod sales from just 1 vending machine at an Atlanta airport over a single month. This is an amazing amount of revenue from a kiosk and may offer a glimpse at how we’ll see high end electronics sold in the future.

Earlier this week, Sanford Bernstein said that they estimated that Apple earns about $4,000 per square foot at their retail stores each year. While this is an impressive number in it’s own right, if Zoom can replicate this type of volume for a full year, it would mean that they have the potential to earn $20,000 in income for each square foot that they take up.

I’ve seen these Zoom kiosks in action and while they don’t dispense DVDs, they are certainly unbelievably hot. Consumers love them and want to try them out, just to use them. The machines are simple enough to use, consumers pick out the type of iPod or accessory that they want, put in their credit card and then the machine gently gives them consumer electronic love. The whole process is actually easier and more enjoyable than a traditional retail transaction and Zoom doesn’t have to pay their robots overtime.

Over the last year, Zoom raised $10 million in round C funding and another $35 million in round D funding just six months later. With a very hot kiosk design, an emphasis on high end retail and backing from investors like Goldman Sachs and Motorola, Zoom is well positioned to lead the kiosk industry from snack foods to luxury goods.

Posted in Technology, Kiosks | 3 Comments »

DVD Play Fast Forwards Into Arizona

December 16th, 2006 Davis

DVD Play is the oldest of the DVD kiosk providers, but also one of the smallest. While the company doesn’t have nearly as many kiosks as Redbox or TNR Entertainment, they do have an important agreement with Safeway to provide DVD rental machines to their stores. According to their website, the company currently has approximately 170 machines, mostly at Safeway locations. All but one of these machines are located in California.

DVD Play’s system is set up very much like the other DVD kiosk players, except they use smaller machines and charge more for their rentals. Their machines only hold 500 discs and they typically offer between 25 - 50 movie choices at any given time. Recently, I asked the Safeway manager near my house about how popular the machines were and he estimates that they rent about 20 DVDs per day from his location. Because the DVDs are $1.50 for the rental and $1.00 for each day after, it means that they need to rent less to be profitable. If DVD Play demonstrates success at these price points, it will be a good test case in how elastic DVD rentals are, once you increase the price over the $1 per night.

One thing that was clear from my conversation with the Safeway manager was that he was really happy to have the machines in his store, regardless of the number of rentals that they achieve. He felt like it added to customer satisfaction and that it gave the store something that they haven’t been able to offer before. In a news article from the Payson Roundup, he’s clearly not the only manager who feels this way. In the article they reveal that DVD Play has started their expansion outside of California and is now rolling out kiosks in Northern Arizona and they also discuss some of the less tangible benefits that Safeway is seeing as a result of this rollout.

“We don’t own or service the kiosk,” said Dan Dillon, Safeway store manager. “We have a contract with the company that does own it, but we’re glad to have it. This is just one more convenience for our customers. People can pick up their prescription, grab some flowers, get a coffee at Starbucks, and then a movie — all in the same ten minutes.”

When looking at the DVD kiosk market, there are really two different customers that need to be served. There is the consumer, who ultimately rents the DVD, but then there is also the retailer who is providing the floor space for the machines. In watching the growth of this industry it’s become clear that retailers like these machines even more then the customers do. Renting DVDs can be a real pain for a grocery store. It takes staff, inventory systems and precious floor space. On the other hand, putting a DVD kiosk near the exit of a store barely takes up any floor space, needs little servicing and has it’s own automated inventory system built in.

Recently, DVD Play hired Dennis Lucas as an Executive Vice President. Lucas was a brillant acquistion for the company and previously had spent most of his career working his way up the corporate ladder of the Albertson’s organization. Just like Netflix depends upon the postal system to act as a distribution partner, the kiosk companies use grocery stores to act as theirs. With Lucas’ extensive background in the grocery industry, he brings skills that will prove invaluable in how DVD Play is able to better serve their grocery partners and demonstrate these less tangible benefits. I see hiring Lucas as being akin to when Netflix hired the former postmaster general to act as their liaison to the post office. While it’s still early for Lucas at the company, I have high expectations for what he can bring to the operational side of DVD Play’s business, as well as to the negotiation table.

DVD Play’s expansion into Arizona makes a lot of sense from a geographical standpoint and could represent a real turning point for the company. DVD Play was founded in 1999 and while they’ve seen slow but steady growth, it’s been anything but explosive. While the company may have gotten off to a slow start, more recently things have been progressing quite nicely for them. At the end of 2004, things looked pretty bleak, but in 2005 the company saw a 200% growth increase and by the end of 05′ they had rented over 4 million DVDs. In 2006, growth has continued to accelerate and they added another 1 million DVDs to this total in the first six months of this year alone. This works out to be an average of approximately 32 DVDs rented a day from their machines.

With the pickup in volume, DVD Play conducted a second round of VC financing and raised another $20 million to help fund further expansion. This brought the total capital that they company has raised to $40 million.

The company plans to use this capital to expand into 1,000 locations by the end of 2007 and has previously said that they would target California, Texas and Florida as ideal locations for this growth.

While DVD Play may have gotten off to a slow start, their recent success and their expansion into Arizona is another clear signal that the DVD kiosk industry is strong, healthy and growing. While I don’t fully understand why it has taken consumers so long to embrace this technology, it’s clear that consumer habits are changing and that more and more businesses and people are becoming comfortable with using kiosks. As video stores continue to come under pressure from a variety of competition, the DVD kiosk will serve an important role in capturing customers who still want instant gratification, at a fraction of the cost of operating a full scale retail store.

Posted in Technology, DVDs, Kiosks, Disclosure - I own stock in co. mentioned, Netflix | No Comments »

TNR Entertainment Hires IBM To Support Aggressive Growth Plans

December 12th, 2006 Davis

With DVD kiosks leaving their infancy years and beginning to approach their toddler years, TNR Entertainment has found that managing this growth has become increasingly difficult. In an attempt to help position the company for more scalable growth in the future, TNR Entertainment has announced that they have hired IBM to support the company over the next several years.

With retail partners moving past the beta phase of DVD kiosks and into the deployment phase, TNR needed a solid backend system that could help them tie all of their machines together and IBM is a natural fit. The multi-million dollar contract will initially run for three years and will enable TNR to focus on aggressively developing their business without having to worry about the constraints that their growth might have to their infrastructure. In a press release announcing their implementation of IBM’s MySAP program, TNR gives some of their rationale behind wanting to outsource their backend software needs.

“At the beginning of the year, we realized that, with our major growth initiatives underway and the tremendous amount of data flow inherent in our business, our systems didn’t have the management tools we needed, now or for the future. IBM was able to quickly assess our needs, develop an IT infrastructure and manage it for us,” said Jay Whitney, vice president of operations for TNR Entertainment. “With the on demand hosting model, we can focus our efforts on expanding the business without having to invest in an entire IT infrastructure from the ground up.”

While taking care of these backend needs will undoubtably solve some of the major headaches that TNR Entertainment faces from a business perspective, from the press release it’s unclear if it solves two of the major pieces that the company is missing from a consumer perspective.

Currently TNR Entertainment lacks the ability for consumers to reserve DVDs via the web. TNR has acknownledged that they’ve been working on a solution to this problem and IBM may or may not be able to help with that process. One thing is clear though and that is without webervations, it will make managing upcoming burn on demand technology very difficult from a logistics perspective. While it’s still early in the DVD kiosk cycle to get too excited about burn on demand functionality, recent comments by Time Warner CEO Dick Parsons and an agreement by the DVD Forum to support this feature in 2007 indicate that the technology is well on it’s way towards being accepted by the major media players in the upcoming year. If IBM is able to assist in tying together the backend inventory with an online inventory that consumers could use, it would go a long way in improving the quality of service that TNR Entertainment is able to give their customers.

The second missing piece of the TNR consumer equation is their inability to accept returns at a different kiosk then the one you rent from. While I doubt that most people take heavy advantage of this feature, it’s certainly a nice bonus for those who are taking long road trips and want to swap DVDs or for those who have several different kiosks that they come across during their daily activities. While the press release does not explicity state that this functionality is coming, it’s reference to better inventory management makes me suspect that this could also be something the IBM may be able to assist TNR Entertainment in developing.

With TNR’s kiosks holding 200 titles and a total of 1,000 DVDs, managing inventory can be an especially crucial component of maintaining a consistent quality experience for their customers. While they want to maximize the turnover on their inventory, they also want to ensure that there will always be plenty of choices for customers when they rent from their kiosks.

Near my house there is a DVDplay kiosk located within a Safeway and the last time I counted there were only 68 films in their inventory and at least forty of them were sold out. While this is a small indication as to how successful these kiosks can be even at a $1.50 price point, it’s also a little dissappointing for someone who has gotten used to being able to browse through Netflix’s deep longtail archives for movies that appeal to my niche tastes.

Whether or not IBM’s software addresses either of these consumer issues for TNR certainly doesn’t negate the importance of this announcement. By outsourcing this functionality of their growth the company can concentrate on more important issues like securing distribution agreements and finding more capital to help them accellerate their growth. With VOD eventually set to replace the DVD, TNR Entertainment only has about a decade to establish their brand as a premium player if they want to make the jump to an all digital world. By leveraging IBM’s expertise, they’ve put themselves in a position to deploy their kiosks even more quickly and to manage their network of mini video stores regardless of how quickly or large it seems to grow.

Posted in Technology, Movies, TV, DVDs, Kiosks | No Comments »

Til Death Do Us Part - Getting Past The 7 Year Digital Itch

December 6th, 2006 Davis

During the throes of the tech bubble, Time Warner became enthralled with a little ole internet company known as AOL. At the time, technology was hot, the markets were robust and the media company was eager to take a stab at digital distribution. While Time Warner didn’t know about the blood bath the tech market was about to face, in 2000, they started a romance with AOL and by the end of the year, their lovefest would ultimately consumate in a merger that has proved to be one of the most costly marriages in the history of the financial markets.

At the time, the merger seemed to make a lot of sense. AOL had a growing internet business. Time Warner had a dusty library of archived content that they were eager to release. By combining both companies, they could create synergies that other media companies couldn’t match. The result however, turned out to be nothing more then disasterous and when AOL officially changed their name back to Time Warner, they all but admited that their tech experiment had gone terribly terribly wrong.

Fast forward to 2006. Time Warner has managed to completely transform their company. They’ve ended their walled garden approach and albeit kicking and screaming, they’ve led the other studios in embracing various digital strategies. With 2006 having brought about a profound revolution in online video, Time Warner has given notice that 2007 will usher in big changes for the company’s film strategies.

On Tueday, Time Warner CEO Dick Parsons, sat down with investors at the Credit Suisse Media and Telecom conference and gave a remarkably candid assesment of his company and their plans for the next year. In his conversation, he discussed the format wars, the competitive landscape of the telecom markets and perhaps most importantly, Time Warner’s digital plans in 2007.

In regards to the format wars, Parsons offered very little hope for consumers who would love to see this silly little battle end. When asked about the potential for the PS3 to be a leader in the HDTV market, Parsons downplayed it’s importance and told the audience that the HDTV flat panel displays would be the real driver for HDTV content growth.

“The format war is unfortunate almost by definition. Because it creates confusion in the minds of consumers, it doesn’t allow a big group to line up behind either one of the formats and begin to drive the costs down so these platforms are going to be out of the reach of the mass market. I mean what is the PS3? Like $600 bucks or something like that? However, even there, I think we’re positioned to take advantage of what uptake there is on the new devices because we’re one of the few studios, if not the only one that is putting out stuff out in both Blu-Ray and HD-DVD.”

While I admire Time Warner for being one of the only studios to be format agnostic and leave it to consumers to decide which is the superior format for the future, I nonetheless disagree that this war was inevitable. The only reason why we haven’t seen broad support for both formats is because of greed. Rather then trusting the markets to decide, both Blu-Ray and the HD-DVD camps have attempted to gain a monopoly on the format and it has clearly backfired as a result.

In discussing Time Warner’s cable assets, Parsons shrugged off concerns about competition from the telecoms. He pointed out that even where FIOS has been deployed, the telephone companies have been acting rationally and are already raising rates in an attempt to profit even after a very limited deployment. While he confessed to not knowing how far the telephone companies would take this video war, he was less then optimistic on satellite’s long term chances in the mix of things.

“If you talk to the guys who really sort of understand, at a profound level, the sort of technological space we’re moving into, a Gates or a guy like Eric Schmidt, and they are the guys who have told me that ‘Geez Dick, you guys with Time Warner Cable’ or I’ll say the same thing with Brian [Roberts] and his cable platform, ‘you don’t understand how far ahead of the rest of the market you are with your platform, it is just that much more robust, it’s going to take these other guys 5 - 6 years to catch up, if they make the investment.’ It turns out they’re right. The cable platform is, in terms of delivering bytes into the home and giving functionality to all of the things you can now do in a digital world, it is just four, five, six years ahead, in terms of it’s robustness and it’s capacity to deliver the telco platform and unless somebody invents something that doesn’t exist today, it will be permanently ahead of the satellite.”

Over the years, we’ve heard an awful lot of noise about FIOS, yet here we are today and there still is less then 1 million households subscribing to fiber in the US. While this is clearly important to the telephone companies, it won’t easily replace the cable systems that have developed over the years. In the long run consumers will benefit from being able to choose between one or the other, just like they benefit from choosing from DSL or cable internet access today, but Parsons may be right that the future of everything on demand may be much further out then anyone expects. While this would undoubtably help Time Warner as a company, I can’t help but feel just a tad disappointed, that the technology is still so far behind where I wish it could be.

After Parsons’ presentation was over, he opened up the conference to a question and answer period. This has always been my favorite part of financial events because often times, this is where the biggest bombshells are released and this event was no exception. When asked about the narrowing of digital release windows between downloads and DVDs, Parsons offered up far more information then I was expecting and mentioned that 2007 will likely be the year that we see burn on demand technology make it’s way into retail stores.

“I think that you’ll see next year, our studios and possible others, going to a download to burn format. The reason we haven’t done it yet is because this has to be worked out and done in cooperation with our existing channel of distribution, I mean you don’t wanna go around the people you’ve been working with in terms of builiding this business at this point in time, so we’ve just seen Walmart for example, go with these little kiosks, it’s all experimental now, these little kiosks in the store where you can actually go and have a download to burn experience instead of having the physical disc and if we do this right, it’s a win win win for everybody. It’s a win for the distribution channel because they avoid a lot of inventory costs and shelf space. It’s a win for the studios, because you avoid a lot of manufactuering costs and you get your product out there more quickly, and it’s a win for consumers because they can get it when they want, how they want and in the format they want it.”

I’ve been fascinated with the DVD kiosk ever since I first had an opportunity to inteview DVD Station and they showed me a DVD kiosk that already had burn on demand technology built into it. While I walked away impressed at the technology, I knew that it would still take years for the studios to embrace a solution this radical.

With the DVD rental stores having been slaughtered in the financial markets and with retailers clearly upset over Apple’s digital download plans of their own, it was only a matter of time before we saw the studios warm to the idea of bringing burn on demand to the retail store level.

By incorporating burning technology into kiosks and retail spaces, video stores and retailers could potentially stock 70,000 films and never have to worry about running out or about it taking up too much floor space. The idea is powerful, the economics could save the DVD industry for another decade and if Parsons’ statement that Redbox is already testing this functionality at Walmart is correct, it may be coming sooner then even I expected.

While it’s taken years for the studios to come up with a sound digital strategy and while I expect that it will likely take even more years to work out an HDTV digital strategy, nontheless I find it very exciting to see these developments. With 2007 marking the 7th anniversary of the AOL and Time Warner meger it is nice to know that consumers will finally be able to take advantage of the synergies that were promised when AOL and Time Warner first said that fateful I do.

Posted in Movies, Technology, Media, HDTV DVDs, DVDs, Kiosks | 2 Comments »

Robots Attack And They Are Working For Less Then Minimum Wage

December 5th, 2006 Davis

Jack in the Box is reporting that they’ve started a new program on a very limited basis, where they refuse to pay their new employees overtime, give them any breaks, make them work 24/7, and they are paying them less then a dollar an hour to take orders from customers. No, they haven’t taken a page out of Walmart’s playbook, instead they’ve introduced fast food kiosks into three of their restaurants.

Basically, when customers show up they now interact with a kiosk instead of with a human. Someone in the back gets the order through a computer and then prepares the meal for the customer. Because the kiosk deals with taking the orders you can avoid spoilage because the kiosk is more accurate and because the kiosk handles the payments you don’t have to worry about the cash register ending up short at the end of the night. In fact even if you get robbed, you don’t even have to worry about them handing over the cash. On the surface, they may not look very tough, but I’ve got it on good authority that they have one armed cousins in Nevada who can be very stingy with paying out money.

I’ve got to say that I find this idea pretty appealling. When I get fast food, it’s not for the food, it’s for the fast. I want in and out with as little chit chat as possible. If kiosk ordering allowed me to order and pay directly, it might actually convince me to go into a Jack in the Box once in a while. Even better, if I could order via the net and pick it up I would be thrilled. I wouldn’t even mind if the cost savings went directly to the shareholders instead of the customers (although it would be nice to see them upgrade to something other then mystery meat.)

With the fast food industry now using centralized drive thrus, kiosk ordering and DVD vending, it’s only a matter of time before the robots take over. Throw in a couple of roombas into the equation and we could have the machines controlling the food supply for the majority of all Americans.

Via Kiosk Marketplace

Posted in Robots, Technology, Kiosks | No Comments »